tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13672227.post929199990103209260..comments2020-09-10T08:39:46.134-05:00Comments on Diary of a ZEN Master: How Confused SysAdmins Are Rendering SPF UselessUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13672227.post-4748207850431691932014-12-09T10:48:45.053-06:002014-12-09T10:48:45.053-06:00Astrin, actually you may have that exactly backwar...Astrin, actually you may have that exactly backwards. False positive most commonly refers to a legitimate message mis-characterized as SPAM. See the following as proof if you will: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj200769%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx<br /><br />The point of the post was that these false positives are highly problematic, and lack of understanding of SPF often a culprit.ZEN Masterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08498873306925948312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13672227.post-32555956566769413322014-11-22T12:51:28.038-06:002014-11-22T12:51:28.038-06:00You mean "false negatives", not false po...You mean "false negatives", not false positives. False positives are spam that is regarded as ham, legitimate email.Astrin Fewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06373645808466548859noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13672227.post-54118771402741975312014-04-14T14:31:46.124-05:002014-04-14T14:31:46.124-05:00haha, im a couple years late but you to trust any ...haha, im a couple years late but you to trust any blogger that we demean a group by saying "Plainly, if you are so dim witted as to put a Barracuda anti-spam appliance in place, little if any of this is making any sense.". Well played sir.Chiphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17639209317006482919noreply@blogger.com